Top
Browse > Home / Tech / Broadcast Flag Good News?

Broadcast Flag Good News?

June 4, 2005

Lots of reports this week about the MPAA’s efforts (or lack thereof) to drag the “Broadcast Flag” back to life as part of upcoming DTV legislation. As usual, the EFF has the skinny…

First there was some apparent good news:

The Motion Picture Association of America is unlikely to push for a broadcast flag component in DTV legislation establishing a 2008 hard date because the bill’s main author, House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX), is against the provision. Meanwhile, the MPAA will keep briefing House and Senate members on a broadcast flag bill’s importance and seek other ways to get the content protections it wants.

A new Congressional Research Service report raises concerns that the broadcast flag’s technological limitations could hinder activities normally deemed “fair use” under copyright law. For instance, students might not be able to email themselves copies of projects incorporating digital video content because no secure system exists for email transmission. “The goal of the flag was not to impede a consumer’s ability to copy or use content lawfully in the home, nor was the policy intended to ‘foreclose use of the Internet to send digital broadcast content where it can be adequately protected from indiscriminate redistribution,’” the report said, quoting from the FCC order.

Then it looked like it might be a bit of premature celebration…

Update: It looks like the “new” report [PDF] was released in April, before the DC Circuit struck down the Broadcast Flag. It repeats the FCC’s assertion of authority to impose the Flag but also notes the objections of public interest organizations (Public Knowledge, EFF, et al.). Evidently, the new bit is that Congressman Barton is (presumably) citing the report to justify his distaste for Broadcast Flag provision, a use we couldn’t possibly encourage more.

So apparently the jury is still out, but appear to be grounds for “guarded optimism” at least…

Like this article? Share it!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Written by Chuck Lawson · Filed Under Tech 
Tags: •

Comments

Got something to say? [privacy policy]





Possibly Related


Broadcast Flag Lesser Evil? Engadget thinks maybe we were all a bit too hasty in celebrating the killing of the Broadcast Flag in US Appeals Court. Their concern? Once Congress gets into this, we might end up with a technical solution to "protecting" digital content that would actually work... However, the fact remains: the Broadcast Flag was a highly sidestep-able solution to the "problem" of content-protection. The technical implementation had more loopholes than a bowl of Fruitloops. Device manufacturers had little incentive to bulletproof their devices and, unlike OpenCable devices, testing wasn’t rigorous enough to ensure that content stayed protected. Furthermore, broadcasts remained in-the-clear and there was nothing to disrupt existing receivers/recorders. In short, the Broadcast Flag would have been as effective as...


More Broadcast Flag FUD from the MPAADan Glickman, CEO of the MPAA has on his hipboots and is spreading it deep over on CNET with "Why the broadcast flag should go forward". Without proper protections, it will be increasingly difficult to show movies, television shows or even baseball games on free television. Free television? What's that? I don't know of any free television. Let's see -- there's the stuff I pay for by watching ads and buying products (broadcast TV), there's the stuff my tax dollars and donations pay for (PBS), there's the stuff I pay a monthly fee for and still watch ads (basic cable/sat programming), and the stuff I pay for and don't see ads on (premium cable/sat programming). Oh, and home shopping, infomercials,...


Return of the Broadcast Flag?Much like the villain in a bad slasher flick, the Broadcast Flag looks to be hard to kill. Last week's Federal Appeals Court decision simply said that the FCC didn't have the authority to issue the mandate, not that it was a bad idea. Many people, including Stanford Law's Lawrence Lessig, feel that the battle will (and should) soon resume in Congress. The heart of the issue is that the content providers -- TV networks and movie studios -- claim that they will not produce HD content without an imbedded hardware DRM like that mandated by the broadcast flag. Congress in turn is afraid that the voters will hit the fan if they force a deadline for everyone to go...


Broadcast Flag Overturned!!!!It's a GREAT day for media fans everywhere! The US Court of Appeals has struck down the FCC's "Broadcast Flag" rule! The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that the Federal Communications Commission did not have the authority to prohibit the manufacture of computer and video hardware that doesn't have copy protection technology known as the "broadcast flag." The regulations, which the FCC created in November 2003, had been intended to limit unauthorized Internet redistribution of over-the-air TV broadcasts. It remains to be seen whether the FCC will attempt to appeal this further, but for the moment, this looks like a great start at undoing some of the damage of the Powell reign at the FCC....


Why Digital TV SucksWell, the oft-promised "end of Analog TV as we know it" is once again upon us, as Congress decides whether to keep or extend the current due date of New Year's Eve 2006. MSNBC (hardly a disinterested party) hashes out some of the issues here. "Congress, however, left itself a loophole in the 1996 legislation, and could actually let the cut-off date slide by. But powerful lobbyists now are pressing legislators to set a “date certain” for the analog lights-out. The debate over when to throw the switch is a strange brew of big money, high technology, homeland security and a single, unanswerable question: just how angry are the couch potatoes going to be? It’s also a textbook example of...

Bottom