Top

Grockster ruling.

June 28, 2005

I’ve been trying to decide just what to say about the Grokster ruling, but I’ve been at a loss for words. Over the long haul, it’s pretty clear that this isn’t going to fix the RIAA or MPAA’s obsolete business models. Over the short haul, however, the chilling effect that this could have on technology is massive.

Mark Cuban thinks that the litigation environment is going to become extreme, and that the only people who are going to actually make money on all of this are the lawyers and the lobbyists.

With the Grokster ruling, going forward, just how onerous will the protection language be for purchases of, or investments in digital technology ? Will it be enough for the target company to promise that they complied ?

Or, will contract appendixes have copies of all marketing materials as confirmation that the target company never induced anyone to infringe on a copyright ? What about emails sent to prospects and customers ? Will we have to save them all to confirm what we did or didnt suggest when marketing and promoting the technology ?

Is this the start of a “Sarbanes Oxley” type environment for technology companies ? Will companies have to save and document everything they do in the marketing and promoting of their technologies ? Will they, or rather, should they video all presentations and record all phone calls ?

How else can we know that we are protected against unwarranted law suits that are used as competitive weapons to slow new technologies ?

Ultimately, this can’t last (he says hopefully), but I think it’s clear that at least for now, the groundhog has seen his shadow and we’re going to be putting up with this miserable situation for a good while yet…

Like this article? Share it!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Comments

Got something to say? [privacy policy]





Possibly Related


Increasingly AdvancedAwhile back I bitched about the state of client-side blog editors… Well, things are improving steadily… w.bloggar 3.01 - Marcelo Cabral has released a new version of w.bloggar—I’ve installed it (and am using it to post this), but haven’t yet had a chance to play with all of the new features, but it looks like some nice ones.  Highlights include support of a Windows Media Player blogging plug-in, extended text support in MovableType (still no excerpt, apparently), and official support for PostNuke (which had previously been via a bit of a hack that one had to track down in the usual PostNuke locations).  I’m especially looking forward to testing the latter, as there were a few PostNuke issues that I...


Digital Rights Management ExplainedI had a long conversation with a friend last week, explaining how "buying" music from iTunes Music Store basically wasn't "buying" it at all... The fact is that most people just don't realize how little they actually get for their money when they purchase DRM'd music (or other materials.) Fortunately, the EFF has just come out with a dandy little guide explaining in simple terms what you're not getting for your money: EFF: The Customer Is Always Wrong: A User's Guide to DRM in Online Music In other words, in this brave new world of "authorized music services," law-abiding music fans often get less for their money than they did in the old world of CDs (or at least, the...


2-4-6-8 Who you gonna disintermediate?Teleread feels that Kodak’s retreat from the film camera business is a signpost that e-books will eventually do the same to the conventional book industry. Does anyone smell a trend here?  As technology emerges to shorten the path from content producer to content consumer, the people who get cut out are the existing middlemen.  If you’re in between content that’s now electronically distributable and the people who buy it, you’d either better a) find some new revenue streams that work WITH the tide, or b) figure out how to quickly drain off as much money as you can while your lawyers stick their fingers in the dike.  Kodak seems to have taken the graceful approach. "You know, at one time...


HD PVRs - Rock and Hard PlaceThomas Hawk has some comments on my Dish 942 article. Thomas writes: These type of HDTV PVRs will be the competition for TiVo and Media Center going forward. It will be important that TiVo and Media Center are able to distinguish themselves in the HDTV PVR space in order to convince people that it is worth spending the money over what you can get for free (kinda free anyway) from your cable or satellite provider. Absolutely -- and there's the rub. HD sources come in three forms today -- broadcast, cable, and satellite. For broadcast, you can get your local channels, unencrypted. Cable and Satellite come with their own encryption on board, and by and large, there's no way to...


MPAA Sues TV Torrent SitesJust in time to target nasty file-sharers who are looking to download a missed season finale or two, ZDNet reports that the MPAA has apparently filed suit against 6 more TV Torrent sites. The latest round of suits retains a focus on BitTorrent technology, which has been widely used online to distribute movies and films. The suits are focused on the sites that serve as traffic directors for BitTorrent swaps, rather than on individual computer users uploading and downloading content. The MPAA also has sued individuals, but has not said how many people have been targeted. I wonder if they'll ever figure out that they're missing a wonderful opportunity to embrace this technology, reduce distribution costs, and sell advertising targeted...

Bottom