Top

Hollywood Motivations

February 3, 2006

Wow… You just don’t often see a good world-class fisking these days that doesn’t directly involve Iraq or Bush, but John Rogers over to Kung Fu Monkey has delivered a nice one on this year’s Oscar nominations and what really drives Hollywood agendas (it’s the money — duh, there’s a shocker.)

However, I think I finally understand — exactly –the tone of voice General Tommy Franks used when describing the REMF-platonic-ideal Doug Feith as the “fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth.” It is not a snarl, nor a roar, but instead a sort of exhausted awe. Because I must say, I do think Jason Apuzzo of Libertas, the wee conservative film movement, possibly may be — and I do not offer this lightly — the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth.

Fortunately he warms to his topic from there, and at length — proving that what Hollywood needs most is more people who can write as well as Rogers…

Rate this:
2.8
Like this article? Share it!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Comments

Got something to say? [privacy policy]





Possibly Related


Hollywood Running ScaredMore on just how “happy” TV execs are with television torrents.... "There is also a more brutal strategy in the works. In his forum speech, [News Corp COO] Chernin said: “Consumers need to understand that stealing is wrong, and there are consequences.” Those consequences are lawsuits. Last week, the Motion Picture Association of America sued an unspecified number of U.S. citizens who allegedly scoop movies online, asking for damages of up to US$150,000 per film traded. Hollywood hopes that a round of legal salvoes will pre-empt TV piracy before it goes mainstream.” “After all, when the Recording Industry Association of America launched cases against more than 6,000 music downloaders last year, the pace of file sharing seemed to slow. That...


Hollywood Lawyers Illiterate?Ah. Suddenly it all becomes clear -- apparently entertainment industry lawyers just can't read. Reuters has picked up a Billboard article with a quote from a "founding member of the International Association of Entertainment Lawyers" which essentially paints Creative Commons as a "serious threat to the entertainment industry." It then goes off on some extremely bizarre tangents which manage to completly miss the point of Creative Commons. Fortunately, Lawrence Lessig has gently and calmly delivered them a detailed fisking in the way only he can. The hyperbole from Mr. Sukin -- a lawyer -- was funny. But what struck me in the article was the assertion by Butler that "Creative Commons urges creators to give up their copyright protection" in...

Bottom