Top

How to destroy the world’s best fan base

November 30, 2005

Back in the day, the Grateful Dead was the top grossing act in entertainment, year in and year out. They toured 300+ days a year, playing to packed houses all over the world.

Part of their success? They didn’t treat their fans like the enemy.

You want to tape a concert? No problem. In fact, we’ll just open up as many seats as we can for tapers who want to plug into our soundboard, and tape our mix directly. We’ve spent all of this money on great audio equipment, no reason to drag your own mikes along…

You want to share and trade tapes? That’s cool — enjoy!

Going by today’s record label “logic” they should have gone broke over this. Instead, they made money hand over fist, like no other act ever has.

Time moves on.

Jerry Garcia passed away in ‘95, too soon to see the Internet Archive’s Live Music Archive end up as a central repository for the band’s legacy, with gigabytes of some of the best fan-recorded music ever created — all free.

Until last week. Last week Grateful Dead Merchandising, who has recently set up their own for-profit live music download venture, asked the Internet Archive to remove all of the soundboard recordings.

The hue and cry has been vast. Motives have been questioned, aspersions have been cast on GDM, Jerry’s widow, and the band’s drummers, who are being pointed to as the culprits. Some, such as lyricist John Perry Barlow and bass guitarist Phil Lesh have been publicly distancing themselves from the decision and it’s aftermath. Others question whether the artists and their estates even have a legal standing regarding material they encouraged others to record.

Where will it all end? Who knows. But there’s a lot of bad blood in deadhead land this week, and it’s going to get worse before it gets better.

One of the better starting points to learn more is this discussion and associated links at Metafilter.

Update 12/01 - Apparently The Dead have reversed their position on this. Yay team!

Rate this:
2.8
Like this article? Share it!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Comments

Got something to say? [privacy policy]





Possibly Related


More Dead recording issuesApparently things aren't quite as rosy as they appeared yesterday in the ongoing saga of Grateful Dead recordings on the Internet Archive. Boing Boing: Grateful Dead "reversal" on fan-recordings is a smokescreen However, it appears that all the talk about "communications SNAFUs" was a smokescreen for a half-assed compromise that leaves the highest-quality recordings available only as streams, meaning that they can no longer be simply downloaded from the Archive and traded on. The spin on this is bizarre -- see below: He said the band consented to making audience recordings available for download again, although live recordings made directly from concert soundboards, which are the legal property of the Grateful Dead, should only be made available for listening from...


The Dead - Fast LearnersOkay, my faith has been somewhat restored in The Dead -- apparently they're a lot faster learners than most of the record labels -- After the Grateful Dead angered some of its biggest fans by asking a nonprofit Web site to halt the free downloading of its concert recordings, the psychedelic jam band changed its mind Wednesday. Internet Archive, a site that catalogues content on Web sites, reposted recordings of Grateful Dead concerts for download after the surviving members of the band decided to make them available again. Band spokesman Dennis McNally said the group was swayed by the backlash from fans, who for decades have freely taped and traded the band's live performances. "The Grateful Dead remains as it...


RIAA Doesn’t Care If You’re DeadApparently the RIAA now feels that dying isn't a good enough excuse to not be sued for stealing music. More here: RIAA sues the dead. "Lawyers representing several record companies have filed suit against an 83-year old woman who died in December, claiming that she made more than 700 songs available on the internet... ...However the RIAA's embarrassment doesn't end there. Chianumba said that she had sent a copy of her mother's death certificate to record company lawyers in response to an initial warning letter, over a week before the suit was filed." At what point will these sanctimonious @holes embarass themselves enough? It must give the average band a real warm feeling to be associated with people like this......


Death will not save you…Apparently the RIAA now feels that dying isn’t a good enough excuse to not be sued for stealing music. More here: RIAA sues the dead. "Lawyers representing several record companies have filed suit against an 83-year old woman who died in December, claiming that she made more than 700 songs available on the internet… ...However the RIAA’s embarrassment doesn’t end there. Chianumba said that she had sent a copy of her mother’s death certificate to record company lawyers in response to an initial warning letter, over a week before the suit was filed." At what point will these sanctimonious @holes embarass themselves enough? It must give the average band a real warm feeling to be associated with people like this…...


Half a loafXeni Jardin writes in Wired about Wilco’s “suprising” success.  It’s becoming a fairly common story—artist gets shat upon by label, artist says “screw it” and puts out a solid representative sample of their music online, artist finds later commercial releases gobbled up by fans.  In this case, they even raised $15K for charity from people who still wanted to pay for the material they released for free. What a concept—let people hear some of the band’s good stuff (not just some not-ready-for-album samples) for free, and they’re more willing to buy stuff.  Nothing new here, mind you—it just used to be called “radio play”. Except of course that several whole species of moneygrubbers evolved to carefully control who got radio...

Bottom