Top
Browse > Home / Tech / Return of the Broadcast Flag?

Return of the Broadcast Flag?

May 10, 2005

Much like the villain in a bad slasher flick, the Broadcast Flag looks to be hard to kill. Last week’s Federal Appeals Court decision simply said that the FCC didn’t have the authority to issue the mandate, not that it was a bad idea.

Many people, including Stanford Law’s Lawrence Lessig, feel that the battle will (and should) soon resume in Congress.

The heart of the issue is that the content providers — TV networks and movie studios — claim that they will not produce HD content without an imbedded hardware DRM like that mandated by the broadcast flag.

Congress in turn is afraid that the voters will hit the fan if they force a deadline for everyone to go digital, and there’s no HD content to take advantage of.

TVPredictions sums this up nicely.

Congressional leaders know that if they pass a law mandating the transition to digital in 2007 or 2008, there better be a dramatic increase in HDTV shows to justify the decision. If not, consumers will blame Congress for forcing them to buy a digital set — or a converter box — without getting much in return. And if there’s limited HDTV programming on the “free” off-air stations, such as CBS, ABC and NBC, people will howl.

The problem is, it’ll never happen.

If today’s studios aren’t willing to pony up HD content — with or without the ability to tell you what, when and where you can watch (the net effect of the Broadcast Flag) — then someone else will.

The studios think they’ve got the government between a rock and a hard place, and that they can force the government to grant them unprecedented control over viewers, by claiming that they’ll take their bat and their ball and go home.

Let ‘em. It’d go a long ways towards hastening their demise.

If the studios don’t come to the table, this will open the door for entrepreneurs like Mark Cuban (currently behind HDNET) and others to take the slack.

Bollywood and Hong Kong already produce a staggering amount of content — if Hollywood decided to kill itself, how long would it be before they started cranking out content geared specificly for the US market?

But the fact is that it’d never happen — if it looked like they were going to lose the market, most Hollywood studios would fall all over themselves to produce HD content — with or without the broadcast flag.

When this comes to congress — and it will, probably sooner than later — be sure to let your congresscritter know how you feel about this cheap attempt to hijack control over your viewing habits.

Rate this:
2.8
Like this article? Share it!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Written by User ImageChuck Lawson · Filed Under Tech 
Tags:

Comments

Got something to say? [privacy policy]





Possibly Related


Broadcast Flag Lesser Evil? Engadget thinks maybe we were all a bit too hasty in celebrating the killing of the Broadcast Flag in US Appeals Court. Their concern? Once Congress gets into this, we might end up with a technical solution to "protecting" digital content that would actually work... However, the fact remains: the Broadcast Flag was a highly sidestep-able solution to the "problem" of content-protection. The technical implementation had more loopholes than a bowl of Fruitloops. Device manufacturers had little incentive to bulletproof their devices and, unlike OpenCable devices, testing wasn’t rigorous enough to ensure that content stayed protected. Furthermore, broadcasts remained in-the-clear and there was nothing to disrupt existing receivers/recorders. In short, the Broadcast Flag would have been as effective as...


Broadcast Flag Good News?Lots of reports this week about the MPAA's efforts (or lack thereof) to drag the "Broadcast Flag" back to life as part of upcoming DTV legislation. As usual, the EFF has the skinny... First there was some apparent good news: The Motion Picture Association of America is unlikely to push for a broadcast flag component in DTV legislation establishing a 2008 hard date because the bill's main author, House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX), is against the provision. Meanwhile, the MPAA will keep briefing House and Senate members on a broadcast flag bill's importance and seek other ways to get the content protections it wants. A new Congressional Research Service report raises concerns that the broadcast flag's technological limitations...


More Broadcast Flag FUD from the MPAADan Glickman, CEO of the MPAA has on his hipboots and is spreading it deep over on CNET with "Why the broadcast flag should go forward". Without proper protections, it will be increasingly difficult to show movies, television shows or even baseball games on free television. Free television? What's that? I don't know of any free television. Let's see -- there's the stuff I pay for by watching ads and buying products (broadcast TV), there's the stuff my tax dollars and donations pay for (PBS), there's the stuff I pay a monthly fee for and still watch ads (basic cable/sat programming), and the stuff I pay for and don't see ads on (premium cable/sat programming). Oh, and home shopping, infomercials,...


Broadcast Flag Overturned!!!!It's a GREAT day for media fans everywhere! The US Court of Appeals has struck down the FCC's "Broadcast Flag" rule! The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that the Federal Communications Commission did not have the authority to prohibit the manufacture of computer and video hardware that doesn't have copy protection technology known as the "broadcast flag." The regulations, which the FCC created in November 2003, had been intended to limit unauthorized Internet redistribution of over-the-air TV broadcasts. It remains to be seen whether the FCC will attempt to appeal this further, but for the moment, this looks like a great start at undoing some of the damage of the Powell reign at the FCC....


Why Digital TV SucksWell, the oft-promised "end of Analog TV as we know it" is once again upon us, as Congress decides whether to keep or extend the current due date of New Year's Eve 2006. MSNBC (hardly a disinterested party) hashes out some of the issues here. "Congress, however, left itself a loophole in the 1996 legislation, and could actually let the cut-off date slide by. But powerful lobbyists now are pressing legislators to set a “date certain” for the analog lights-out. The debate over when to throw the switch is a strange brew of big money, high technology, homeland security and a single, unanswerable question: just how angry are the couch potatoes going to be? It’s also a textbook example of...

Bottom